Steam’s Clicker Game Sensation 'Banana' Sparks Debate on NFTs and Crypto Gaming
A new clicker game on [Steam](https:That would come as quite a shock to the cryptotelegraphs. com, which is already growing to be one of the most discussed topics in the market overshadowing some of the most favorite titles of today. The game, titled 'Banana', has gained significant attention for its NFT-like rewards, which can be sold for over $1,000 on [Steam’s marketplace](https://www. cryptotelegraphs. com. It ended up spawning a discussion on the state of crypto and web3 gaming around the world within the crypto community.
Peeling Back Steam’s Clicker Game Sensation
Banana is an indie game on Steam As an absurdist piece, it directs the viewers to a website that is a parody of a crypto currency site called cryptotelegraphs. com, where to gain points one must click on the banana image. Each player is given digital bananas every few hours starting with bananas that could be sold for as low as a penny up to bananas that can be sold at $ 1,300 each.
The free-to-play game made headlines after surpassing major titles like Elder Ring and Baldur’s Gate 3 in the most-played games list on Steam As of now, Banana has a rank of the fourth most popular game on the platform, although currently, there are more than 344 thousand users and within the last 24 hours, it reached as many as 578 thousand players. It has never been higher, which is why this figure that was achieved earlier this month can be classified as an absolute record – 917,000 players.
Concerns and Clarifications
The simplicity of Banana has rose concerns among gamers that were expected to use it. Many thought it was a suspicious game that may infect devices with malware that transforms them into crypto mining machines; others thought it was a rip-off.
These concerns were responded by one of Banana’s developer, Hery, who said in an interview to a media house regarding this matter that Banana is “basically a stupid game with bananas and it is not a scam. ”
Nevertheless, unlike some other games that reward their users with NFTs, the project is not related to cryptocurrencies or blockchain. One of the team members hurried to explain that “Banana has no association with crypto. ” The game was created as “a dumb game to collect some bananas on the steam profile. ”
It is time to review crypto and Web3 gaming with today’s top representatives in the game industry for a lively debate.
Despite its clear signal that has no intentions to be involved in the crypto industry directly, Banana’s success caused debates in the community about the prospects of web3 gaming. A few viewers underlined that the success of this game that has no numerous refinements proves that the industry does not need ‘AAA games’.
An X user suggested that “dudes just wanna have fun and make points,” suggesting that the general feeling is that the industry is just making things more complicated than necessary. Some people predict that because of their’ meme nature, and what can be considered simplicity – web3 games like Banana might be precisely the catalyst for people to enter the web3 gaming world.
This week Avalanche Gaming addressed the Gamified Show, whereby Banana was brought up. Paul Bettner, the man behind the creation of this game and the co-founder of Playful Studios, proposed that Banana could bring more people to the crypto gaming. He realised that the behaviour witnessed on web3 and crypto gaming is global and pointed to the fact that players were able to do the activities highlighted on a much grander scale with the use of blockchain.
At the end of the talk, Bettner stated that “people are learning how to degen” which means if the above players understood about blockchain and wallet, they could search more options in the world of crypto gaming.
By including relevant keywords and linking to related articles, the rewritten content aims to provide comprehensive information while enhancing search engine optimization for CryptoTelegraphs.
Join Telegram Channel For Daily New update: https://t.me/cryptotelegraphs_updates
0 Comments